United States v. Kirschner’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 6003
Relies on Fisher v. United States · Doe v. United States · United States v. Hubbell · United States v. Doss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“him to divulge through his mental processes his password[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he expression of the contents of an individual's mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.