Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 N.E.2d 1197 - Sandlin v. State

Sandlin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Danks · Sabo v. Sabo · Stephens v. State · Pugh v. State · Pugh v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender. 2 . In her argument that the imposition of her full suspended sentence was unreasonable, Sanders implies that the trial court believed that it was required to impose the entire amount of the sentence originally suspended. However, we have reviewed the transcript of the probation revocation hearing and find nothing that indicates that the trial court believed that it was required to impose the entire amount of the sentence originally suspended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Absent a fairly explicit statement to the contrary, we presume a trial court is aware of its authority to order executed time following revocation of probation that is less than the length of the sentence originally imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.