Martin v. Dicklich’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973F (§ 8 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)
Relies on American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl · Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc. · Aronovitch v. Levy · Fetsch v. Holm · Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the ballot preparation and availability deadlines, the expense associated with ballot preparation and election administration, and the need for voter certainty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trooien v. Simon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.