823 So. 2d 210 - Tran v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 659 So. 2d 239 - De La Rosa v. Zequeira · 462 So. 2d 446 - Duest v. State · 801 So. 2d 877 - Overton v. State · 814 So. 2d 334 - Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. Tejada · 823 So. 2d 110 - Amerace Corp. v. Stallings
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to establish concealment, the moving party must demonstrate, among other things, that the voir dire question was straightforward and not reasonably susceptible to misinterpretation. A juror's answer cannot constitute concealment when the juror's response about litigation history is ambiguous and counsel does not inquire further to clarify that ambiguity. Birch v. Albert, 761 So.2d 355, 357 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.