Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

823 So. 2d 265

Docket No. 3D02-937.

Ramos v. State

Ramon RAMOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-08-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2002

2 state decisions

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · 729 So. 2d 984 - Hidalgo v. State · Garcia v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ramon Ramos, in proper person.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sandra R. Braverman (Fort Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

¶3Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SORONDO, JJ.

¶4SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

¶5The defendant appeals from, and we reverse, the denial without evidentiary hearing of his application for Rule 3.800 relief which claimed that he had been improperly denied credit for time served prior to sentencing. The order below was based on the holding that the defendant must pursue administrative remedies in the Department of Corrections prior to seeking court relief. As the State agrees, however, this rule applies only to claims to time served after sentencing. See Garcia v. State,736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Hidalgo v. State,729 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The cause is remanded for an appropriate hearing on the appellant's motion at which he may prevail if "the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief." State v. Mancino,714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998); Thurman v. State, *266 811 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Garcia,736 So.2d at 1224.

¶6Reversed and remanded.

/823/so2d/265 · .json · Public domain