Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 So. 2d 593 - Drake v. State

823 So. 2d 593 - Drake v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez · 585 So. 2d 765 - Corley v. State · 618 So. 2d 103 - Gaskin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`if sufficiently specific, an indictment or information can be used as the sole source of the factual basis for the plea.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Drake was aware of the charges against him and the consequences that would result upon entering a guilty plea. He still chose to enter such a plea. Drake swore to the trial court that he had competent representation and that the elements of the crime were explained to him. He further stated that his counsel read him the written guilty plea and that he understood what it stated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “or otherwise, is sufficient to establish a factual basis for six guilty pleas where those indictments are not read to the defendant during the guilty plea colloquy. As stated in Drake : The purpose of the factual[-]basis rule is to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.