Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

823 So. 2d 832

Docket No. 2D02-1425.

Crawford v. State

Lionel R. CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-08-14

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2007

6 state decisions

Relies on 537 So. 2d 982 - Smith v. State · Terry v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*833 COVINGTON, Judge.

¶2Lionel R. Crawford appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, Crawford alleged that he was entitled to be resentenced pursuant to Smith v. State,537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989). The trial court's order is not responsive to Crawford's motion and has no attachments.

¶3We accordingly reverse and remand for reconsideration of Crawford's motion. See Terry v. State,787 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (reversing summary denial of rule 3.800(a) motion because trial court's order was not responsive to motion and had no attachments). If the trial court again determines that summary denial is proper, it must set forth its rationale and attach any relevant portions of the record that conclusively show relief is not required.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

¶5WHATLEY, NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

/823/so2d/832 · .json · Public domain