Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2001
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. State · Long v. State · Dugard v. State · Johnson v. State · Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Relying on Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Crim.App. 1987), Martin contends that the trial court committed fundamental error in its charge to the jury in the punishment phase of the trial by including an instruction concerning Martin's parole eligibility under TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 37.07 (Vernon 1981 Supp. 1992). The trial court's instruction on good conduct time and parole is specifically authorized by statute. (Footnote omitted.) The trial judge did not error in giving the parole instruction the jury. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.