Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 823 SW2D 50 - State v. Joiner

State v. Joiner’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2015

20 state decisions

100199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · 161 Wis. 2d 324 - State v. Lindh · State v. Leisure

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The testimony of a witness regarding the statement of another is hearsay only when the statement is offered as proof of the matters stated therein. The state did not offer the statements for the truth of the matter asserted. Rather, the evidence was offered to show knowledge and motive. This was a permissible use of the statement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant in a criminal prosecution has a constitutional right to cross-examine the witness, for the purpose of showing possible motive or self-interest on actual or threatened criminal charges presently pending by efforts of the same prosecutor. Under such circumstances there is an existing, possible motivation to testify favorably for the prosecutor even if no deal is pending or likely. It is sufficient if the witness might perceive a possible benefit, (internal citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.