Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 F.2d 1522 - Abel v. Miller

Abel v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

824 F.2d 1522 · 1987

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

32 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Rakovich v. Wade (1988), Conner v. Reinhard (1988)

32 federal appellate ·

3301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Bell v. Wolfish · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... the right the official is alleged to have violated must have been “clearly established” in a more particularized, and hence more relevant, sense: The contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would un derstand that what he is doing violates that right.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]o determine whether such legal norms existed at the pertinent time, we often refer to closely analogous case law, decided before the public official acted or failed to act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the legal norms allegedly violated by the defendant were clearly established at the time of the challenged actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.