Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 F.2d 417 - United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Empirical Analysis

824 F.2d 417 · 1987

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2000), Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications Commission (1999)

28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 717 · 15 U.S.C. § 717O · 15 U.S.C. § 717R · 28 U.S.C. § 2348

Relies on Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Curtis v. Loether · Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. · Castor v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If we permit an intervenor to raise additional issues for review, we contravene the sixty-day filing limit... by permitting filings as late as 90 days after the order....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “) ("[I]ntervenors may not challenge aspects of the Commission's orders not raised in the petitions for review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “negligence, bad faith, fault, or willful misconduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.