Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 F.2d 557 - Oliver POLLARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REA MAGNET WIRE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Oliver POLLARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REA MAGNET WIRE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant’s Empirical Analysis

824 F.2d 557 · 1987

Citation profile

252
cited by 252 later decisions
6
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

150 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 252 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Dister v. Continental Group, Inc. (1988), Shager v. Upjohn Co. (1990)

150 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions

15501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters · McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 252 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No matter how medieval a firm's practices, no matter how high-handed its decisional process, no matter how mistaken the firm's managers, Title VII and § 1981 do not interfere.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reasons honestly described but poorly founded”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the employer gave an honest explanation of its behavior.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.