Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 F.2d 672 - Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission’s Empirical Analysis

824 F.2d 672 · 1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
August 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2014

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission · Wisconsin Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations v. Gould Inc. · Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clean ah- and water laws, selective cutting requirements in forest operations, industrial safety standards, tax increases — all pro tanto hobble collective bargaining in that they constitute part of the universe in which collective bargaining takes place, just as do general prosperity or depression. But they do not add to or detract from the rights, practices, and procedures that together constitute our collective bargaining system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where a challenge to a state regulatory scheme asserts that the proceeding or regulation at issue is beyond the state's authority [because of preemption by a federal statute], abstention ... arguments are seldom applicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.