Cassettari v. County of Nevada’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.2d 735 · 1987
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 33 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Lacey v. Maricopa County (2012), Herrington v. County of Sonoma (1987)
21 federal appellate · 33 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Baskett v. United States · Jizmejian v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he Constitution ... does not require a state to provide pre-taking notice [or] an opportunity to be heard,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Cassettari also argues that when the County took his property without paying him for it, the County violated his fourth amendment right to be secure against unreasonable seizures. This argument is without merit. A claim for the taking by a state of private property for public use without just compensation is properly asserted under the fifth and fourteenth amendments.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the deprivation of a federal right occurs regardless of the availability of a state remedy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.