Cassim v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.2d 791 · 1987
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Soranno's Gasco, Inc. v. Morgan (1989), International Jensen Incorporated v. Metrosound Usa Inc La (1993)
26 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320C (§ 1156 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Goldberg v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party seeking a preliminary injunction must fulfill one of two standards, described in this circuit as 'traditional' and 'alternative.' Under the traditional standard, a court may issue preliminary relief if it finds that (1) the moving party will suffer irreparable injury if relief is denied; (2) the moving party will probably prevail on the merits; (3) the balance of potential harm favors the moving party; and (4) the public interest favors granting relief. Under the alternative standard, the moving party may meet its burden by demonstrating either (1) a combination of probable success and the possibility of irreparable injury or (2) that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in its favor.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“one whose resolution would not serve the purposes of exhaustion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To determine what process is due, we must balance the risk of an erroneous deprivation, the [government's] interest in providing specific procedures and the strength of the individual's interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.