Gray Lines Tour v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.2d 811 · 1987
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2005
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 49 U.S.C. § 10101 (Bus Regulatory Reform Act of 1982) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade · Huddleston v. United States · Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. Virginia · Steamboaters v. Federal Energy Regulatory, Commission · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Children's Hospital Medical Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“set aside a ruling of the ICC only if its findings or conclusions are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right or unsupported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 89-35455“it can alter previously announced policies, or fashion exceptions and qualifications, if it reasonably explains the alteration”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to avoid state regulation. Pennsylvania Public Utility Com'n v. Arrow Carrier Corp., 113 M.C.C. 213, 219 (1971) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.