Pandit v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.3d 1 · 2016
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Reyes Mata v. Lynch · MONREAL · Fesseha v. Ashcroft · ANDAZOLA · Luna v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the INA, as under our century-old practice, the reason for the BIA's denial [of a motion to reopen] makes no difference to the jurisdictional issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moreno v. Garland“[i]n order for a motion to reopen to succeed, it must ... establish a prima facie case for the underlying substantive relief sought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jimenez v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.