Cayuga Nation v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.3d 321 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2024
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988)
Relies on Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union · Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms · City of Sherrill New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al. · Thompson v. County of Franklin · Runs After v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'alleged an intention to engage in a course of conduct arguably affected with a constitutional interest, but proscribed by a statute, and there [must] exist[ ] a credible threat of prosecution thereunder.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“have alleged that they intend to conduct bingo games, which is clearly prohibited by the Ordinance, and the Village has announced its intention to enforce the Ordinance against the Nation and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“BIA 'has both the authority and responsibility to interpret tribal law when necessary to carry out the government-to-government relationship with the tribe.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rabang v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.