Battaglia v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.3d 470 · 2016
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3599
Relies on Barefoot v. Estelle · Nken v. Holder · Panetti v. Quarterman · Nelson v. Campbell Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections et al. · McFarland v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether or not [Battaglia's counsel] should have represented Battaglia in state competency proceedings, he did not do so. Accordingly, we conclude that [Battaglia’s counsel] 'abandoned' Battaglia for purposes of pursuing a [competency] claim.” (emphasis in original)). . Id. . Id. at 475 . . Id. . See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 46.05(f) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Battaglia v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.