In re Arunachalam’s Empirical Analysis
824 F.3d 987 · 2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 134 · 35 U.S.C. § 141
Relies on Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Copelands' Enterprises, Inc. v. CNV, Inc. · Loughlin v. Ling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exclusive jurisdiction ... of an appeal from a decision of ... the [Board] with respect to [an] ... inter partes review under title 35.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. As v. Iancu“We have held that § 1295(a)(4) should be read to incorporate a finality requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. As v. Iancu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.