Malone v. Microdyne Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · In re Disbarment of Gonzales · DiLeo v. Ernst & Young · Luce v. Edelstein · Yamamoto v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party has been fully heard ... and there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We expected to close sales in 30 to 60 days. Instead, the product is taking 90 days or longer to sell in quantity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Our estimate of the product's eventual success has not changed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.