Boggs v. Boggs’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Brown (1997), State v. Armenta (1997)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Von Hake v. Thomas · Thomas v. Thomas · Coleman v. Coleman · Salzetti v. Backman · Foreman v. Foreman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the contempt is not committed in the immediate view and presence of the - court or judge at chambers, an affidavit shall be presented to the court or judge of the facts constituting the contempt, or a statement of the facts by the referees or arbitrators or other judicial officers. 10”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A judgment of criminal contempt is generally considered to be a final order separate from ongoing proceedings and appeal-able as a matter of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. R.T. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.