Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 P.2d 718 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
4
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Nielson v. Benton (1995), Bauman v. Day (1995)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 65 state decisions

4501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank · Zeman v. Lufthansa German Airlines · Moore v. State · Ransom v. Haner · Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “determine whether any genuine issue of material fact exists and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment on the law applicable to the established facts.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Fairbanks Police Department Chapter, Alaska Public Employees Ass'n v. City of Fairbanks · Thomas v. State, Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Environmental Health, Food Safety & Sanitation
  2. “"whether the party asserting the inconsistent position has gained an advantage or produced some disadvantage through the first position; whether the inconsistency was of such significance as to make the present assertion unconscionable; and, whether the first assertion was based on full knowledge of the facts."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cruise Lines Int'l Ass'n Alaska v. City & Borough of Juneau · Mortvedt v. State, Department of Natural Resources
  3. “[An appellate] court is not bound by the reasoning articulated by the trial court and can affirm ... on alternative grounds. Moore v. State, 553 P.2d 8, 21 (Alaska 1976). Moreover, [an appellate] court should consider any matter appearing in the record, even if not passed upon by the lower court, in defense of the judgment. State v. Pete, 420 P.2d 338, 341 (Alaska 1966); Ransom v. Haner, 362 P.2d 282, 285 (Alaska 1961).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Pruitt v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.