Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 824 SE2D 555 - Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 234 Ga. App. 556 - McKay v. State · 178 Ga. App. 534 - Hogan v. State · Cargile v. State · Jackson v. State · State v. Ware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “challenges the sufficiency of the substance of the indictment) (emphasis in original). 4 In this regard, we direct the parties to the helpful analogy to the Civil Practice Act expressed in Kimbrough :”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “challenge to the sufficiency of an indictment because it fails to set forth all of the essential elements of the charged crime is properly considered a general demurrer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.