824 So. 2d 358 - State v. Ste. Marie’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 719 So. 2d 49 - State v. Thomas · 661 So. 2d 571 - State v. Coates · State v. Hyde · 679 So. 2d 543 - State v. McCray · 801 So. 2d 424 - State v. Ste. Marie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The facts of this case persuade me after reconsideration that it is not one course of conduct when it involves different people over that period of time and under the particular circumstances and the testimony that I heard and found credible and be lieved and that was the basis for this decision. I remain persuaded that consecutive sentences are appropriate in this case. I leave it for the appeal courts and writs to the Supreme Court to tell me otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Simpson“to be assigned to another judge in the 16th Judicial District Court for resentencing.” The Court instructed the resentencing judge to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Simpson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.