Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

824 So. 2d 997

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 28, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-08-28

Relies on 350 So. 2d 462 - Delap v. State · Murphy v. State

Decided 2002-08-28

¶1ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

PER CURIAM.

¶2As the trial court has certified after unsuccessful efforts to re-establish the record under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), and as the state agrees, material omissions in the transcript of testimony make meaningful appellate review of the trial below impossible. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for new trial is granted. See Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462 (Fla.1977); Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and cases cited. The conviction and sentence below are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

¶3Motion granted.

/824/so2d/997 · .json · Public domain