Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 243rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Hernandez v. State · Waddell v. Hon. Court of Appeals ex rel. First District of Texas · Hawkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence was unknown to the movant-defendant at the time of trial; (2) the failure to discover the evidence was not due to the movant’s want of diligence; (3) the evidence is admissible, and not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral or impeaching; and (4) the evidence is probably true and will probably bring about a different result on another trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Saenz v. State · Molinar v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.