Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 1016 - Yashon v. Hunt

Yashon v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 1016 · 1987

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Randall v. United States (1994), Mertik v. Blalock (1993)

23 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

27019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Circuit has already held that an individual is not entitled to the assistance of counsel in informal university administrative proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures-used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a physician's unprofessional conduct, incompatibility and lack of cooperation on a hospital staff are appropriate considerations for denying staff privileges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.