Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 1095 - Morales v. Cadena

Morales v. Cadena’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 1095 · 1987

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably North v. Madison Area Ass'n for Retarded Citizens-Developmental Centers Corp. (1988), McKnight v. General Motors Corp. (1992)

11 federal appellate ·

1501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Daniels v. Williams · Michelson v. United States · La Montagne v. American Convenience Products, Inc. · Wolf-Lillie v. Sonquist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ultimately, we must determine whether there was substantial evidence to support the jury verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.