United States v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.2d 121 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Herrmann v. United States · United States v. Xheka · United States v. Gallagher · United States v. Richard H. Gens, United States of America v. Anthony W. Carleton, United States of America v. Richard T. Porter · United States v. Krepps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... is an unauthorized, unjustifiable, or wrongful use of the association's funds with the intent to injure or defraud the association. 74 To show a willful misapplication, the government must prove a conversion of [the] association's funds to the use of a defendant or third party. However, ... actual loss need not be proved. It is sufficient that the defendant at least temporarily deprived the association of the possession, control or use of its funds. 75 The word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“complicated morass of clandestine financial dealings ... [that] ultimately inured”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.