Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 1324 - George L. Barry v. Otis R. Bowen

George L. Barry v. Otis R. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 1324 · 1987

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc. (1993), Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan (1992)

70 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

6601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 221 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Hall v. Cole · F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co. · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air · Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “both the underlying government conduct at issue and the totality of circumstances present before and during litigation.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wilderness Soc. v. Tyrrel · 52 soc.sec.rep.ser. 417, unempl.ins.rep. (Cch) P 15639b, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9435, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,511 Michael P. Sampson v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security
  2. “only in exceptional cases and for dominating reasons of justice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman · Brown v. Sullivan
  3. “congressional intention to constrain litigants from hiring high-priced lawyers with the expectation that the government will pick up the tab.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Love v. Reilly · Love v. Reilly

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.