Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 314 - United States v. Robert O'keefe, John Edwin Montgomery, Jr., United States of America v. John Montgomery, and Robert T. O'Keefe

United States v. Robert O'keefe, John Edwin Montgomery, Jr., United States of America v. John Montgomery, and Robert T. O'Keefe’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 314 · 1987

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. Poole (1989), United States v. Biaggi (1990)

38 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

26019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Harris v. McRae · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · United States v. Hedman · United States v. Cole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding a Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal, a district court must “determine whether, viewing all the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and drawing all inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury’s verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not necessary for the evidence to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be wholly inconsistent with every conclusion except that of guilt, provided a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]n a Hobbs Act prosecution of a public official, the Government's burden is simple: it must prove that the public official obtained property from another in exchange for performance of his official duties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.