Iam National Pension Fund Plan Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corporation Iam National Pension Fund Benefit Plan a’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.2d 415 · 1987
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 19 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 v. Centra, Inc. (1991), Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund (1987)
49 federal appellate · 19 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 294 · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 4201 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 4202 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 4203 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1384 (§ 4204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1385 (§ 4205 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1397 (§ 4217 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Griffith v. Kentucky · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any dispute between an employer and the plan sponsor of a multiemployer plan concerning a determination made under [29 U.S.C. Secs. 1381-1399] shall be resolved through arbitration.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'it should be beyond cavil that the existence of an issue of statutory interpretation, standing alone, does not justify bypassing arbitration.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b)(1) If no arbitration proceeding has been initiated pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the amounts demanded by the plan sponsor under section 1399(b)(1) of this title shall be due and owing on the schedule set forth by the plan sponsor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.