Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 671 - Campos v. LeFevre

Campos v. LeFevre’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 671 · 1987

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020 · most notably Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation (1990), Washington v. Bumgarner (1989)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

12019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Cardillo v. United States · Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc. · Hill v. Hawes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Extension of Time for Appeal. The bankruptcy judge may extend the time for filing the notice of appeal by any party for a period not to exceed 20 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by this rule. A request to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal must be made before the time for filing a notice of appeal has expired, except that a request made no more that 20 days after the expiration of the time for filing a notice of appeal may be granted upon a showing of excusable neglect. . . . "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[N]o particular form of words is necessary to render a filing a 'motion.' Any submission signed by a party that may fairly be read as a request to the district court to exercise its discretionary powers . . . should suffice”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is only one way to obtain an extension of time, and that is to file a motion above and beyond the notice of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.