Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 684 - Farber v. Wards Co.

Farber v. Wards Co.’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 684 · 1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2015

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 365 · 11 U.S.C. § 502

Relies on S & W Holding Company v. Julius Kuriansky, Trustee, in the Matter of W. L. Boffa, Inc., Bankrupt · Diversified Services, Inc. v. Harralson · 120 Wall Associates v. Schilling · In Re North Atlantic & Gulf Steamship Company · Field v. Herrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 15(c) governs the `relation back' of amended pleadings only for the purpose of the statute of limitations, which is simply not implicated in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.