United States v. Abner’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.2d 835 · 1987
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2005
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · McMann v. Richardson · United States v. Cronic · Kimmelman v. Morrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Adverse effect is not the equivalent of prejudice, the reasonable probability of a different result, as the term 'prejudice' is defined in Strickland. Injury sufficient to justify reversal is presumed from the showing of adverse effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... must establish that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his counsel's performance in order to establish a claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.