Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

825 F.2d 89

Docket No. 84-3706.

Frazier v. Heebe

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-08-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1987

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Frazier v. Heebe · Frazier v. Heebe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-08-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Cornish F. Hitchcock, Washington, D.C., Gregg L. Spyridon, Lafayette, La., Gary L. Roberts, Pascagoula, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.

Curtis R. Boisfontaine, Cicero C. Sessions, Sally A. Shushan, New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Edwin F. Hunter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding.

On Remand From The Supreme Court of the United States.

Before GOLDBERG, POLITZ, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

After a bench trial, the district court rejected challenges to the local district court rules of the Eastern District of Louisiana. We affirmed, Frazier v. Heebe, 788 F.2d 1049 (5th Cir.1986). The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, exercising its supervisory authority, reversed. Frazier v. Heebe, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 2607, 96 L.Ed.2d 557 (1987). We now remand to the district court for entry of a judgment consistent with the decision and mandate of the Supreme Court.

/825/f2d/89 · .json · Public domain