Haynes v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.2d 921 · 1987
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably Henry Lee Dennis v. Dayton Poppel (2000), United States v. Fields (2009)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Bozza v. United States · Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Hicks v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exceeds or is outside the statutory limits, or is wholly unauthorized by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Munn v. Ward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.