SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC.’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.3d 1341 · 2016
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 141 · 35 U.S.C. § 311 · 35 U.S.C. § 312 · 35 U.S.C. § 314 · 35 U.S.C. § 315
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. · Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic Inc · Phillips v. AWH Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“difficult to imagine either party anticipating that already-interpreted terms were actually moving targets, and it is thus unreasonable to expect that they would have briefed or argued, in the alternative, hypothetical constructions not asserted by their opponent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may not change theories in midstream without giving respondents reasonable notice of the change and the opportunity to present argument under the new theory.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Persons entitled to notice of an agency hearing shall be timely informed of ... the matters of fact and law asserted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.