Ventura v. Kyle’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.3d 876 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Rosenblatt v. Baer · Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler · Cason v. Baskin · Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to prevail on a claim of unjust enrichment, a claimant must establish an implied-in-law or quasi-contract in which the defendant received a benefit of value that unjustly enriched the defendant in a manner that is illegal or unlawful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel ... should[ ] make his objection, take his exception, or ask for remedial action at the close thereof and before the case is submitted to the jury”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dean v. Searcey“counsel's comments were ... a deliberate strategic choice to try to influence and enhance damages by referencing an impersonal deep-pocket insurer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burke v. Regalado
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.