Runningeagle v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis
825 F.3d 970 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Coleman v. Thompson · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable probability that the trial-level IAC claim would have succeeded had it been raised”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). Dr. Foster discussed Livaditis's history of trauma, child abuse, and neglect. Although Dr. Foster proposed several clinical diagnoses, those diagnoses were based on interviews conducted nearly ten years after the murders. See id. at 988 (discounting diagnosis produced more than 20 years after the crimes were committed). Moreover, on the crucial issue of brain damage, Dr. Foster simply opined that Livaditis's symptoms were”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Livaditis v. Davis“such a hearing could enable an applicant to prove the petition's factual allegations, which, if true, would entitle the applicant to federal habeas relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kayer v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.