Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 FSUPP 1003 - Steinhilber v. Lamoree

Steinhilber v. Lamoree’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2011

1 district · 1 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc. · Madara v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Florida long-arm statute must also be strictly construed to ensure compliance with due process requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.