Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F. Supp. 2d 905 - Lora v. Boland

825 F. Supp. 2d 905 - Lora v. Boland’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2255 · 18 U.S.C. § 2256

Relies on New York v. Ferber · Maryland v. Louisiana · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Federal Election Commission v. Akins · Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hether any of the Plaintiffs are 'persons aggrieved' entitling them to monetary damages under § 2252A(f) ; whether the minor Plaintiffs suffered 'personal injury' under § 2255 as a result of the criminal violations; whether the definition of child pornography in § 2256(8)(c) violates the First Amendment; and whether the application of the federal child pornography statutes to an expert witness in Boland's circumstances violates the Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Any person aggrieved by reason of the conduct prohibited under subsection (a) or (b) or section 1466A may commence a civil action for compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, and reasonable attorney fees and costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “under § 2255 as a result of Boland's conduct, and (2) whether the Appellants were”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.