Abran v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · South Dakota v. Opperman · Arkansas v. Sanders · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court has broad discretion in ruling on the admissibility of evidence. Accordingly, we will reverse a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence only when the trial court abused its discretion. An abuse of discretion involves a decision that is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and cireumstances before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“The `inventory exception' allows police to conduct a warrantless search of a lawfully impounded automobile if the search is designed to produce an inventory of the vehicle's contents.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Combs v. State“integrally related-in other words, one thing led to another-then the crimes may be considered a single chain of events for purposes of venue,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.