Davidson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Baird v. State · Overstreet v. State · United States v. Unser · In re Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict the Defendant, the State must have proved each of the following elements: The Defendant 1. knowingly or intentionally 2. killed 3. Samuel Creekmore.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. State“[d]efendants have a constitutional guarantee to have every element of their offense proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Staton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.