Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SE2D 129 - Tyner v. State

Tyner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Malcolm v. State · United States v. Smith · United States v. Bayless · Dixon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must point to a legal error that was not affirmatively waived, the error must have been clear and not open to reasonable dispute, the error must have affected [her] substantial rights, and the error must have seriously affected the fairness, integrity[,] or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.