Price v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Vergara v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the employment of trickery or deceit to obtain a confession does not render the resulting statement inadmissible so long as those tactics are not designed to procure an untrue statement and also do not amount to a slightest hope of benefit or remotest fear of injury”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DAVIS v. the STATE.“[t]o make a confession admissible, it shall have been made voluntarily, without being induced by another by the slightest hope of benefit or remotest fear of injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]t is permissible for the police to tell a suspect that the trial judge may [favorably] consider his truthful cooperation with the police.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.