Friedman v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 249 So. 2d 27 - St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry · 388 So. 2d 274 - Chan v. Brunswick Corp. · 417 So. 2d 272 - Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass Inc. · 575 So. 2d 1345 - GEICO Financial Services, Inc. v. Kramer · 527 So. 2d 249 - DuBreuil v. Regnvall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no need, either for purposes of finality, or for obtaining a writ of execution, for a money judgment to provide for execution to issue.... Execution only needs to be addressed if the court wishes to stay execution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was not material and therefore did not delay the time for seeking review. See also Chan v. Brunswick Corp., 388 So.2d 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (words”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.