Matluck v. Matluck’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 Cal. App. 4th 113 - Cho v. Superior Court · 730 So. 2d 289 - Koulisis v. Rivers · 880 F. Supp. 1487 - Poly Software International, Inc. v. Yu Su · Esquire Care, Inc. v. Maguire · McKenzie Construction v. St Croix Storage Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) Former Clients of Newly Associated Lawyer. When a lawyer becomes associated with a firm, the firm may not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that lawyer, or a firm with which the lawyer was associated, had previously represented a client whose interests are materially adverse to that person and about whom the lawyer had acquired information protected by rule 4-1.6 and 4-1.9(b) that is material to the matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.