Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 1078 - Mullen v. Mullen

Mullen v. Mullen’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 565 So. 2d 820 - Gentile v. Gentile · 594 So. 2d 819 - Moon v. Moon · Nicewonder v. Nicewonder · Gregg v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[although a] trial court has broad discretion in valuing [marital assets], the trial court must arrive at an appropriate figure without merely resorting to an estimation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Property valuation which is not supported by competent, substantial evidence cannot stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.